رواء مكة صوت و صورة

"Ruwa Makkah" Hassan Oreid .. A traumatic experience emit an ideological record in Morocco Abu Zeid's speech

In a video clip of a small group of preachers and thinkers on the television show "Brothers of Brotherhood," the Islamic thinker Abu Zeid was not in the midst of an unpaid advertisement for a book by Moroccan writer Hassan Oreid, documenting a journey of pilgrimage years ago with its spiritual dimensions And contemplative.

Ruaa Makkah, which was published two years ago, suddenly became the most sought-after book in the major Moroccan libraries. Its electronic version is heavily circulating through social networking pages, accompanied by a heated debate that may stem from the privacy of the writer, the modern intellectual and rationalist who spent years in the highest political power pyramid in the Kingdom. , Before moving to the bank of a critical critic of the political system in the country.

This is also due to the personality of the witness (Idrissi), a thinker, political activist and one of the leaders of the Islamic Justice and Development Party (AKP), which has already provoked controversy in his intellectual positions. The most recent of which is his lecture in which he defrauds the famous physicist Stephen Hawkins, Atheism.

Abu Zeid's speech came in the context of a glorified book that can be classified as a novelist, praising the intellectual value of the author and his language and the scope of his horizons, but the method of praise and the temptation to read the text reflected in the form of conflicting positions, among those who saw a positive definition of literary and intellectual impact on the pilgrimage - The spirit and the place - and the number of ideological reading reduced the book in the instrument of repentance from the rational thought of secular to the spirit saturated by the appeal to God, especially as the witness speaks of a man was "deviant", drink wine and doubts the faith and disavow rituals and rituals.

It is interesting to note that in the midst of a wide-scale Facebook debate about a book that could have been limited to a certain elite, ideological polarization and ready-made judgments appeared to be the lady of the situation in the absence of analytical readings from within the text that questioned its creativity and aesthetics.